| L1 · COMPANY & IDENTITY |
|---|
| Founded yearfounded_year | | | |
|---|
| Ownership typeownership_type | Private Verified conclusionContextFounder-controlled, with strategic minority shareholders. | Public Verified conclusion | Private Verified conclusionContextThe operating brand is privately held; the consolidated parent, shareholder structure and group UBOs remain unresolved. |
|---|
| Delivery modelsdelivery_models | Standalone, Turnkey Verified conclusionContextIndividual modules can be bought standalone or assembled into the full turnkey stack. EveryMatrix does not offer a provider-licensed white label. | Standalone, Turnkey Verified conclusionContextOperators can license individual products standalone or take a full turnkey platform while holding their own operating license. | Turnkey, Standalone Verified conclusionContextSOFTSWISS does not currently sell a genuine white label or bundle a provider sublicense. Turnkey products run under the operator's license; incorporation and banking remain operator responsibilities. |
|---|
| L3 · LICENSING & CERTIFICATIONS |
|---|
| Provider licensesprovider_licenses | EveryMatrix Software Limited: active MGA/B2B/201/2011 and active UKGC 039383-R-319384-027 (gambling software, casino game host and real-event betting host; pool betting pending), Everymatrix Technology (UK) Limited: UKGC 022201-R-305119-028 surrendered 16 June 2026, Everymatrix IOM Limited: Isle of Man Software Supply surrendered 15 May 2026 Verified conclusionContextCuraçao OGL/2024/655/0239 and additional market permissions remain unresolved at exact-holder and current-record level. The current UKGC account is 39383. The former UK entity and Isle of Man permission are historical and are not counted as current. Curaçao is linked to local company number 108354, but the exact current legal name remains unresolved. Romania, Greece, Sweden, Denmark, Gibraltar, Peru, Western Cape, Ontario and US permissions require holder-level reconciliation. Alberta approval remains unresolved, with no active EveryMatrix entity as of 9 August 2026. | Playtech plc: active UKGC account 38516, remote license 038516-R-319097-032 and non-remote license 038516-N-319098-021, plus MGA/CRP/137/2007, Ormston Limited: current Gibraltar Gambling Services (B2B), with legacy RGL 097, Quickspin AB: Swedish gambling-software permit through 30 June 2028, Playtech Software Limited: Alberta Platform Provider registration through 23 July 2027 and Critical Gaming Systems Provider registration through 13 July 2027 Verified conclusionContextOntario and additional US permissions remain unresolved at exact entity and number level. UKGC account 38516 includes remote bingo, casino, gambling software, Gaming Machine Technical Full, real-event betting and virtual-event betting, plus non-remote software and technical scope. The MGA critical-supply license covers Types 1, 2 and 3. Ormston holds the Gibraltar B2B class, but its exact current number is unresolved; RGL 097 is a legacy reference from 31 March 2025. Playtech Software Limited's two Alberta registration classes have different expiry dates. Regulated Ontario and US deployments establish market access, not the exact holder and identifier. | Stable Aggregator Limited: active MGA/B2B/942/2022 for Type 1 casino and Type 2 fixed-odds betting, including live betting Verified conclusionContextA separate unnamed SOFTSWISS-brand entity received a one-year Tobique B2B licence in 2024; its current renewal and entity are not established. Direct licences, product certifications and compatibility with operator frameworks are separate. Isle of Man and Anjouan compatibility are not SOFTSWISS licences; the Anjouan route is supplied through authorised partners. |
|---|
| Certificationscertifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018, WLA-SCS:2024 Level 2, WLA Responsible Gaming Framework Supported conclusionContextGLI-19 and GLI-33 with unresolved artifacts. PCI DSS certificate XM4iOBPG9K81QRa expired on August 17, 2026; a current replacement certificate is not established. Current terms are WLA Responsible Gaming through September 29, 2026, ISO 20000 certificate ITSMS-109/21 through June 3, 2027, ISO 27001 certificate UK.ISMS.263 through August 4, 2027, and WLA-SCS through June 1, 2029. GLI-19 is associated with GamMatrix and CasinoEngine and GLI-33 with OddsMatrix, but tested builds, identifiers and current terms remain unresolved. | ISO 27001, ISAE 3402 and PCI DSS audit scope, jurisdiction-specific game and system testing Supported conclusionContextAnnual audit activities include ISO 27001, ISAE 3402, PCI DSS and global regulatory testing. Exact entity, site, product, certificate-number and expiry scope remains unresolved; testing laboratories are not themselves certification names. | ISO 27001, GLI-19, GLI-33, PCI DSS compliance Supported conclusionContextGLI-19 covers the Casino Platform and GLI-33 the Sportsbook. ISO 27001 and PCI DSS certificate identifiers, legal entities and scopes remain unresolved. |
|---|
| Regulated markets readyregulated_markets_ready | No defensible conclusion yet What remains unresolved50+ country and state market footprint; 15+ regulated jurisdictions with live clients. The current 50+ market footprint is broader than the set of licences directly held by the group and does not mean 50 live full-stack deployments. | Great Britain, Malta, Italy, Spain, New Jersey, Michigan, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Delaware, Connecticut, Ontario, Alberta, Colombia, Brazil, Mexico, Greece, Romania, Peru Verified conclusionContext50+ regulated jurisdictions overall; these are the major markets. This is group reach, not a promise that every Playtech vertical is approved in every listed market. Brazil became regulated in January 2025; Connecticut became Playtech's sixth US iGaming state in March 2026. | Brazil, Peru, South Africa, Estonia, Greece, Romania, Nigeria, Ghana, Latvia, Spain, Serbia, Bulgaria, Ireland, Mexico, Portugal, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany Verified conclusionContextPlus six international frameworks. The footprint contains 19 national and 6 international frameworks. Product scope differs by market, and readiness or certification is not an operator licence. |
|---|
| L4 · TRUST & DUE DILIGENCE |
|---|
| Financial stabilityfinancial_stability | Stable Editorial inferenceContextLTM net revenue of EUR 196.3m, LTM EBITDA of EUR 107m, a 52% Q1 2025 margin and 74% cash conversion indicate strong capacity; full FY2025 results and audited accounts remain unavailable. | Stable Verified conclusionContextFY2025 continuing revenue was EUR 763.6m, Group Adjusted EBITDA EUR 197.0m, free cash flow EUR 29.5m and year-end net cash EUR 28.5m. On 9 July 2026 Playtech guided to H1 Adjusted EBITDA above EUR 155m and FY2026 of at least EUR 270m. Headline EBITDA includes associate and investment income and should not be treated as pure platform earnings. | Stable Editorial inferenceContextSeventeen years of operation, an estimated 2,000–2,200 staff, 1,500+ brands, continued acquisitions and product launches support an operating-stability conclusion. This is not a solvency finding: consolidated revenue, profit, cash and debt remain unresolved. |
|---|
| Ownership transparencyownership_transparency | Partial Editorial inferenceContextPimino Ltd holds 61.74% of the parent and is owned 85% by Ebbe Groes and 15% by Philip Groes; Stian Hornsletten's Hit The Post AS holds 12.99%. Founder vehicles therefore account for 74.73%; the remaining 25.27% cap table remains unresolved. | Clear Verified conclusionContextPublicly listed on the London Stock Exchange since 2006, FTSE 250 constituent. | Partial Editorial inferenceContextMaterial entities and the historical 2019 share transaction are established, but the current consolidated parent, shareholder table, UBOs and audited accounts remain unresolved. |
|---|
| L6 · CORE PLATFORM / PAM |
|---|
| PAMpam | Yes Verified conclusionContextGamMatrix is now EveryMatrix Platform. | | |
|---|
| Architecturearchitecture | Modular Verified conclusion | Modular Verified conclusion | Modular Editorial inferenceContextCustomer-facing modules are separable. The engineering estate mixes service-oriented components, monolithic cores and fully microservice products rather than one uniform architecture. The Casino Platform began a staged production migration to Oracle Kubernetes Engine in July 2026. |
|---|
| L7 · INTEGRATION & ENGINEERING |
|---|
| Open APIopen_api | Yes Verified conclusionContextFull API access is offered for bespoke front ends and modular third-party integration. | | |
|---|
| L10 · DATA OWNERSHIP, PORTABILITY & EXIT |
|---|
| Data ownershipdata_ownership | Operator Editorial inferenceContextThe operator is the defensible controller and owner of player and operational data; EveryMatrix retains its software and derived-IP rights. AI terms also reserve performance data and, unless the customer opts out in writing, a license to use customer data to train or improve EveryMatrix AI. Retention and post-exit handling remain contractual. | Operator Editorial inferenceContextStandard for a licensed PAM. The operator holds the licence and acts as data controller; Playtech runs IMS as the processor. Exact ownership terms are contract-specific. | Operator Verified conclusionContextThe operator owns its player database at all times. |
|---|
| Data export formatsdata_export_formats | CSV, API, Streaming Supported conclusionContextExports include CSV, APIs and a dedicated Kafka stream. Power BI is a destination, not an export format; dedicated-server delivery is a topology rather than a format. | API Editorial inferenceContextPAM+ is an open platform with integrations and detailed reporting; a complete raw player and transaction export API is not established. | No defensible conclusion yet What remains unresolvedReporting exports and Affilka interfaces do not establish the format of a complete player-database exit dump; require the full schema and delivery method in the contract. |
|---|
| L12 · GAMES & CONTENT |
|---|
| Game aggregatorgame_aggregator | | | |
|---|
| Games countgames_count | 45,000+ Supported conclusionContextSlotMatrix covers 45,000+ casino, live-casino, crash, table and instant games. | 20,000+ Supported conclusionContextCounted as Playtech Marketplace titles. Marketplace spans Playtech and partner studios. The exact owned-only game count remains unresolved, so the aggregate is not a first-party game count. | 40,000+ Supported conclusion |
|---|
| Live casinolive_casino | | | |
|---|
| L16 · ADD-ON VERTICALS |
|---|
| Sportsbooksportsbook | | | |
|---|
| L19 · CRYPTO DEPTH |
|---|
| Crypto nativecrypto_native | No Verified conclusionContextCrypto appears only through third-party payment methods; there is no native blockchain wallet, custody, settlement, or Web3 gaming stack. | No Verified conclusionContextRegulated-market fiat platform built around the IMS player hub. Playtech games show up at third-party crypto casinos, but crypto handling sits with the operator, not Playtech. | Yes Verified conclusionContextBuilt around crypto from 2013, one of the first iGaming platforms to take Bitcoin. |
|---|
| L20 · PAYMENTS & CASHIER |
|---|
| Payment methods countpayment_methods_count | 300+ Supported conclusionContextThe 300+ figure counts payment options; exact deposit and withdrawal availability remains country-, merchant- and provider-specific. | 1,000+ Supported conclusionContextThis is Playtech's wording across gateway partners, not a count of 1,000 distinct consumer payment methods. | 300+ Supported conclusionContextThe current ecosystem covers 300+ payment methods. |
|---|
| L28 · MARKET & REGULATORY DEPTH |
|---|
| Live regulated marketslive_regulated_markets | Great Britain, Germany, Denmark, Croatia, Hungary, Norway, Finland, Ontario Supported conclusionContext15+ regulated jurisdictions with live clients. Named deployments include the UK, Germany, Denmark, Croatia, Hungary, Norway, Finland, Ontario and five U.S. states. Alberta had conditional approval in May, but no EveryMatrix entity was active there as of 9 August 2026; Alberta is not counted as active or live. | Great Britain, Italy, Spain, Greece, Romania, New Jersey, Michigan, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Delaware, Connecticut, Mexico, Colombia, Brazil, Peru, Ontario, Alberta Verified conclusionContext50+ regulated jurisdictions overall; these are the named live deployments. Product scope varies: Playtech Live studio capacity is concentrated in NJ, MI and PA, while broader casino/PAM/content supply extends to six US iGaming states. The July 2026 Alberta entry covers casino and live content for multiple licensed operators; the exact operator roster remains unresolved. | Brazil, Peru, South Africa, Estonia, Greece, Romania, Nigeria, Ghana, Latvia, Spain, Serbia, Bulgaria, Ireland, Mexico, Portugal, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany Verified conclusionContextProduct availability differs across the 19 national markets; inclusion means a product is certified or compliant, not that one SOFTSWISS entity holds every local operator licence. |
|---|
| US market accessus_market_access | Yes Verified conclusionContextSupplier permissions and/or transactional waivers in Connecticut, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. | Yes Verified conclusionContextBy March 2026 Playtech operated online casino in six states: New Jersey, Michigan, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Delaware and Connecticut. Products and partners differ by state. | No Verified conclusionContextHolds GLI-19 and GLI-33 certifications but no live US state regulated market access. |
|---|
| L30 · WHITE LABEL OFFER |
|---|
| WL offeredwl_offered | No Verified conclusionContextEveryMatrix is a pure B2B supplier with no B2C licenses or consumer-facing brands; turnkey customers operate under their own licenses. | No Verified conclusionContextPlaytech is a B2B supplier on a turnkey licensing model. It does not run a classic white label where it holds the B2C gaming license and the operator just brands the front end. Operators license the platform and content and hold their own licenses. | No Verified conclusionContextSOFTSWISS sells turnkey and standalone casino solutions where the operator holds the license. It does not act as a master licensee handing out sub-licenses, so there is no genuine white label. |
|---|
| L31 · TURNKEY OFFER |
|---|
| Turnkey offeredturnkey_offered | | | Yes Verified conclusionContextSold as turnkey and standalone. There is no genuine white label, the operator runs under its own license. |
|---|
| L32 · COMMERCIAL TERMS |
|---|
| Contract termcontract_term | 3 years Verified conclusionContext36-month start period; the earliest ordinary termination is at month 48. One 2020 agreement ran for 36 months from launch and then continued indefinitely unless either party supplied at least 12 months' written notice, making the earliest ordinary termination 48 months after launch. Modular deals vary. | ~3 years Verified conclusionContextAverage 36 months; 8 years in the Caliente reset. Playtech recognizes setup fees across the whole related contract, with an average period of 36 months. The current Caliente software and services agreement runs for eight years. Other product-specific agreements include six-year, multi-year and through-2028 terms. | No defensible conclusion yet What remains unresolvedThe standard contract term remains unresolved. |
|---|
| Termination noticetermination_notice | 12 months in one 2020 agreement Verified conclusionContextOne 2020 agreement required no less than 12 months' prior written notice after the start period. Separate breach and non-payment cure periods were shorter. | Contract-specific; allow for a long phased notice on a full PAM replacement Editorial inferenceContextNotice periods are contract-specific. Product-only termination is materially simpler than replacing IMS, wallet, CRM, reporting and several verticals. | No defensible conclusion yet What remains unresolvedNegotiate a transition period aligned with database export, PSP/content replacement and regulatory notifications. |
|---|
| Total cost of ownershiptotal_cost_of_ownership | Enterprise and scope-sensitive Editorial inferenceContextOne 2020 full-stack contract reached a EUR 41,400 monthly floor from month 19 before compliance costs and revenue share, with a 48-month minimum and remaining-term exit liability. Model every module, third party, change request, certification, data, and exit cost. | Very high enterprise TCO: core licence/revenue share plus integration, certification, data/content, payment, customisation and optional managed-service costs Editorial inferenceContextThe price buys unusual vertical breadth and delivery capacity; model it against a modular stack and the cost of later exit. | Premium, quote-only and highly scope-dependent Editorial inferenceContextModel platform, content, payment, licensing/certification, frontend, migration, hosting and managed-service costs together. |
|---|
| L34 · SUPPORT & SLA |
|---|
| Support levelsupport_level | | 24/7 Verified conclusionContextPlaytech operates 24/7 multilingual services with more than 500 managed-services staff across customer service, KYC, risk, payments, reconciliation and engagement. | |
|---|
| L35 · ONBOARDING, MIGRATION & IMPLEMENTATION |
|---|
| Realistic launch timerealistic_launch_time | 6–9 months for complex regulated full stack; days to weeks only for bounded existing integrations Editorial inference | Several months for a full enterprise integration Verified conclusionContextConnecting an existing brand to a single Playtech product can run a few weeks, but a full IMS platform build with player and wallet migration is a multi-month project. | 1–3 months for a full casino turnkey; 2–4 weeks Sportsbook; about 3 weeks Game Aggregator Editorial inferenceContextThe range combines product targets with dependencies around custom frontend, PSPs, certification, licensing and operator readiness. |
|---|
| L36 · EDITORIAL |
|---|
| Biggest riskbiggest_risk | Treating 'full stack' as one simple purchase. Each entity, license, module, minimum, revenue share, PSP and merchant duty, data flow, SLA, content right, migration dependency and exit obligation must be decomposed before the headline bundle can be costed safely. Editorial inference | Full-stack switching cost and contract opacity, compounded by concentrated economics: one Mexican customer was 14.4% of FY2025 continuing revenue and Hard Rock-led H1 2026 revenue is expected to normalise. Editorial inference | SOFTSWISS spans multiple entities and approvals, making the exact contracting company, product certificate, jurisdictional permission, data-export terms and payment counterparties material to each deal. Adverse media around related offshore businesses warrants enhanced diligence but does not establish regulatory findings against the platform supplier. Editorial inference |
|---|
| Best use casebest_use_case | A multi-jurisdiction operator or lottery replacing legacy technology with a regulated, omnichannel, API-first stack while retaining modular product choice and full data access. Editorial inference | A tier-1 operator launching or scaling casino, live and sportsbook across UK/EU/US/LatAm on one proven, regulated platform. Editorial inference | Launching or scaling a licensed casino or crypto-led brand that wants a high-capacity PAM, broad game aggregation and optional sportsbook/prediction-market modules from one supplier. Editorial inference |
|---|
| Bottom linebottom_line | EveryMatrix remains the strongest independent full-stack shortlist candidate. Its 8.8 score reflects exceptional product depth alongside contractual lock-in risk. Buy it only through an entity-mapped, SLA-backed and fully costed agreement with explicit certification scope, growth economics, data transition and exit protection. Editorial inference | Shortlist Playtech when supplier accountability and owned vertical breadth matter more than architectural lightness or price transparency. It can run nearly the whole regulated operation, but only a buyer able to negotiate hard on SLA, data portability, commercial minimums and exit should take the whole stack. Editorial inference | A high-capability shortlist supplier for licensed, well-funded operators—especially casino and crypto—but diligence must match the complexity of the brand, entities, approvals and private contract terms. Editorial inference |
|---|
| L37 · CATALOG META |
|---|
| Pricing transparencypricing_transparency | On-request Verified conclusionContextThe rate card remains contract-specific; commercial structure is bespoke and predominantly revenue-share based. | On-request Verified conclusionContextBusiness-model categories are clear; rates, minimums, implementation fees and SLA remedies are quote-only. | On-request Verified conclusion |
|---|