About

What we do

We track the B2B providers behind online gambling operators. That covers platform and PAM software, game aggregators, turnkey casinos, white-label solutions, and sportsbook engines. We investigate them through one broad framework and publish our assessment.

The goal is simple: publish the fullest defensible picture of this market, so operators can build a shortlist from reality instead of sales decks and the industry has a record it can cite.

Independent by design

We are a fully independent project. We don't sell rankings, and a place on our list cannot be bought. No provider can pay to move up, buy a better score, or soften a review — position reflects our independent editorial judgment, grounded in the dataset and wider investigation. When our view of the provider changes, the order changes.

We also don't run ads for the providers we review. Our Advertising Policylays out exactly how money does and doesn't touch the site.

How we handle the data

We score the things that actually change a build, like content, platform depth, licensing, commercial terms, speed to market, and support. We ignore marketing spend and vendor PR. You can read the full breakdown in our Methodology.

Each field contains our fullest defensible conclusion, not a feed of other people's claims. Competing accounts and incomplete facts are resolved inside the research process. A supported but not fully verified conclusion is labeled accordingly; a field stays empty only when we cannot responsibly resolve it.

The database keeps different facts in different domains: provider capability and fit, exact legal-entity permissions, product and assurance artifacts, provider × market implementation status and selected platform-facing requirements. One layer never substitutes for another.

Accountability, not provider control

We own every published conclusion and keep the current record accurate. Material corrections, updates, and score changes are logged in our Editorial record. Providers have the same free route as anyone else to challenge a fact and may submit an on-record response.

A provider statement is clearly labeled and kept separate from our assessment. It can add context, but it cannot buy, delete, delay, or rewrite our conclusion. When the underlying reality or our conclusion changes, we update the data, explanation, and—when warranted—the score ourselves.

How the site is funded

Right now we're focused on the data rather than revenue. If we add a way to fund the work later, like clearly labeled advertising or affiliate links, it will be marked as such and kept well away from the scoring. It will never change a ranking. The Advertising Policy spells out the rules.

Who it's for

Operators comparing platforms, startups picking their first stack, and anyone who needs a straight read on the iGaming supplier market.

Get in touch

Found a mistake, or a provider we should add? Email us at sup@igamingplatformproviders.com or use the contact page. Material outcomes remain visible in the Editorial record.